Skip to main content

Ai Weiwei's "Sunflower Seeds" : A Marxist Approach

In more concrete terms approaching a literary text or an artistic work through using marxism a theoretical tool leads to reflect about the "text(content) / context" relationship.
The context proves to be a key element in understanding the content in its ideological expression.

it is important to consider Ai Weiwei's oeuvre in general and understand his artistic ideologies before tackling his artistic installation  Sunflower Seeds:









It becomes clear through his oeuvre and through his interviews that Ai Weiwei is a socialist realist artist. He is committed. He does not see art in terms of beauty but in terms of consciousness. He is committed be the voice of the voiceless those whose voice has been taken away from by fear and terror. Humanitarianism and cultural conservatism seem to be two recurring ideologies in his art. His commitment is not at the service of dominant discourses but rather anti-propagandist. He reacts against totalitarianism in all its forms. He is unstoppable standing for the causes that he defends at the detriment of his own wellbeing and freedom. His art is not an art for art's sake. It is an art with purpose and it is progressivist in its nature because it aims at making a change. It is reactionary and stands against the status quo. It deals with reality as it is but manages to be optimistic in offering solutions and aiming at raising awareness. His art is made accessible to the masses mainly for that purpose of changing things to the better.

Having now a look at his artistic installation Sunflower Seeds




In Marxism it is important to consider the content, its context and the ideological implication of the relationship between the two. In other words, we are concerned with what the work of art is about, the context in which it has been created, and how does the content of work of art relate to that context (i.e. does it consolidate it or does it contradict and react against it).

The Sunflower Seeds is about millions and millions of fake sunflower seeds made of porcelaine (China's most symbolic raw material). The work of art is not squeezed into the exhibition part only but the whole making of The Sunflower Seeds is a significant part of the work. The process where by the seeds were made is a traditional, rudimentary, artisanal one. It is a slow chain of production. These are hand made sunflower seeds. Each seed is unique. No two seeds are the same and are skillfully crafted that they look unbelievably real.

The Context in which this work is made is capitalist, industrial, westernized China where automation replaced Chinese craftsmanship. An automation resulting in the fast, massive production of identical, low quality products.

The work of art stands in sharp contrast with its context. Ai Weiwei aims clearly at making a reactionary statement through his art. He counter mirrors reality for the sake of criticizing it by highlighting the negative aspects of that reality. This counter representation of reality reveals his conservatism. His ideology of conservatism (that is clearly expressed through that contrast between the content and the context) rethinks and revises the made in China label.
In his made in China that is made of china (China's most refined skill as history asserts it), he pushes us to question the current image that the world has of Chinese products. He highlights the difference between the real China and the westernized China restoring by that the image of China and Chinese culture.

There is also another ideology feeding the work of Ai Weiwei and it is his humanitarisme. Through his oeuvre he has always fought for human dignity. Through the choice of the traditional Chinese process of production he has also restored the image of China and Chinese culture by showing that it is a culture that has respect for the working class and the artisans in not overexploiting them and valuing their work as well as preserving their dignity.  

     







  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feminism and Post-colonialism

(From Post-colonial Studies Reader by Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin) In many different societies, women, like colonised subjects, have been relegated to the position of ‘ Other ’ , ‘ colonised ’ by various forms of patriarchal domination. They thus share with colonised races and cultures an intimate experience of the politics of oppression and repression. It is not surprising therefore that the history and concerns of feminist theory have paralleled developments in post-colonial theory. Feminist and post-colonial discourses both seek to reinstate the marginalised in the face of the dominant, and early feminist theory, like early nationalist post-colonial criticism, was concerned with inverting the structures of domination, substituting, for instance, a female tradition or traditions for a male-dominated canon. But like postcolonial criticism, feminist theory has rejected such simple inversions in favour of a more general questioning of forms and modes, a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formalism and New Criticism: Case Study

New Criticism: Russian Formalism:  Defamiliarization is about a delay in meaning that highlights the meaning at the moment of unveiling it. Consider how the meaning is delayed in this poem by Mahmud Darwish. Make a parallel between the poem above and the theoretical reflection about defamiliarization below:  In his well-read essay “Art as Technique” (which is also known as “Art as Device”), Shklovsky argues that literariness is simply the product of a particular use of language – it is our language of the everyday  defamiliarized . That is to say, literariness is the result of working language so that it “makes strange” or interrupts our habituated or automatic perception of the word. By interrupting our automatic perception of the word in this way, the reader is forced to make extra effort in determining the meaning of the text and in so doing, Shklovsky argues, our wonder of the world is re-enlivened. He puts it like this: “Habitualization devours w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Psychoanalytic Criticism

Freudian Criticism:  Broadly speaking, so called Freudian criticism or classical psychoanalytic criticism - which is often speculative - is concerned with the quest for and discovery of (and the subsequent analysis of) connections between the artists (creators, artificers) themselves and what they actually create (novels, poems, paintings, sculpture, buildings, music, etc.). As far as literature is concerned it analyses characters 'invented by authors', the language they use and what is known as 'Freudian imagery'. Thus in the Freudian method a literary character is treated as if a living human being; whereas, for example, in the method of Jacques Lacan literature is seen as the symptom of the writer. (from Penguin's Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory) Psychoanalytic criticism adopts the methods of "reading" employed by Freud and later theorists to interpret texts. It argues that literary texts, like dreams, express the secret unco...
Post a Comment
Read more